![]() ![]() 109A, the judge erred in concluding that no remedy Transfer and likely would not have been reachable by a creditor of her In the brokerage account, which was not the subject of a fraudulent Judgment, where the judgment protected the wife's original one-half interest Value of the account from the date of the original transfer to the date of The wife, subject to proportional changes due to market activities in the The brokerage account on the date of the defendant's original transfer to With her as joint tenants), in an amount representing one-half the value of Transferred to her title in that account (which he had previously owned Transferred the contents of a brokerage account after the defendant had 109A, the judge did not err in ordering entry of judgment,Īgainst the trustee of a trust into which the defendant's wife had Judgment permitting the plaintiff to recover from the defendant, rather than Transfer to her under the statute, this court remanded the case for entry of a ![]() The wife with respect to that account because the defendant had made no Wife's however, where judgment should not have entered against ![]() One-half interest in a savings account held in his name and in his Imposing an equitable remedy permitting the plaintiff to reach the defendant's l09A, the judge did not abuse his discretion in Massachusetts has a strong public policy to protect the interest of non-debtor Was contemplated by the statute and supported by the record and where Judge, and the judge here made a reasoned weighing of the equities that The statute commits the form of a judgment to the discretion of the trial Plaintiff in satisfaction of a money judgment against the defendant, where That the defendant's interest in the house be subject to attachment by the Held by the defendant and his wife as tenants by the entirety, and further The defendant to his wife of his interest in their marital residence beĪvoided and that the house be restored to its pretransfer status with title 109A, the judge properly ordered that a transfer from In a civil action alleging, inter alia, claims under the Uniform Fraudulent (3) SJC-11393 11 Appellees Mardirosian Brief.(2) SJC-11393 10 Appellant Bakwin Reply Brief.(1) SJC-11393 01 Appellant Bakwin Brief.631 DecemApCourt Below: Superior Court Department, Barnstable County Present: IRELAND, C.J., SPINA, CORDY, BOTSFORD, GANTS, DUFFLY, & LENK, JJ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |